lane detection
- Europe > France > Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.49)
- Transportation > Ground > Road (0.53)
- Information Technology > Robotics & Automation (0.43)
- Automobiles & Trucks (0.43)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
TopoLogic: An Interpretable Pipeline for Lane Topology Reasoning on Driving Scenes
To tackle the aforementioned issues, we introduce TopoLogic, an interpretable method for lane topology reasoning that is based on lane geometric distances and the similarity of lane query in semantic space. The geometric distance-based approach aims to mitigates the impact of endpoint shift, thereby more robustly learning lane topology.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.68)
Fine-Grained Representation for Lane Topology Reasoning
Xu, Guoqing, Li, Yiheng, Yang, Yang
Precise modeling of lane topology is essential for autonomous driving, as it directly impacts navigation and control decisions. Existing methods typically represent each lane with a single query and infer topological connectivity based on the similarity between lane queries. However, this kind of design struggles to accurately model complex lane structures, leading to unreliable topology prediction. In this view, we propose a Fine-Grained lane topology reasoning framework (TopoFG). It divides the procedure from bird's-eye-view (BEV) features to topology prediction via fine-grained queries into three phases, i.e., Hierarchical Prior Extractor (HPE), Region-Focused Decoder (RFD), and Robust Boundary-Point Topology Reasoning (RBTR). Specifically, HPE extracts global spatial priors from the BEV mask and local sequential priors from in-lane keypoint sequences to guide subsequent fine-grained query modeling. RFD constructs fine-grained queries by integrating the spatial and sequential priors. It then samples reference points in RoI regions of the mask and applies cross-attention with BEV features to refine the query representations of each lane. RBTR models lane connectivity based on boundary-point query features and further employs a topological denoising strategy to reduce matching ambiguity. By integrating spatial and sequential priors into fine-grained queries and applying a denoising strategy to boundary-point topology reasoning, our method precisely models complex lane structures and delivers trustworthy topology predictions. Extensive experiments on the OpenLane-V2 benchmark demonstrate that TopoFG achieves new state-of-the-art performance, with an OLS of 48.0 on subsetA and 45.4 on subsetB.
- Information Technology (0.48)
- Transportation > Ground > Road (0.34)
Pandar128 dataset for lane line detection
Beránek, Filip, Diviš, Václav, Gruber, Ivan
We present Pandar128, the largest public dataset for lane line detection using a 128-beam LiDAR. It contains over 52,000 camera frames and 34,000 LiDAR scans, captured in diverse real-world conditions in Germany. The dataset includes full sensor calibration (intrinsics, extrinsics) and synchronized odometry, supporting tasks such as projection, fusion, and temporal modeling. To complement the dataset, we also introduce SimpleLidarLane, a light-weight baseline method for lane line reconstruction that combines BEV segmentation, clustering, and polyline fitting. Despite its simplicity, our method achieves strong performance under challenging various conditions (e.g., rain, sparse returns), showing that modular pipelines paired with high-quality data and principled evaluation can compete with more complex approaches. Furthermore, to address the lack of standardized evaluation, we propose a novel polyline-based metric - Interpolation-Aware Matching F1 (IAM-F1) - that employs interpolation-aware lateral matching in BEV space. All data and code are publicly released to support reproducibility in LiDAR-based lane detection.
- Transportation > Ground > Road (1.00)
- Automobiles & Trucks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.68)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
CARLANE: A Lane Detection Benchmark for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation from Simulation to multiple Real-World Domains Julian Gebele
Unsupervised Domain Adaptation demonstrates great potential to mitigate domain shifts by transferring models from labeled source domains to unlabeled target domains. While Unsupervised Domain Adaptation has been applied to a wide variety of complex vision tasks, only few works focus on lane detection for autonomous driving. This can be attributed to the lack of publicly available datasets. To facilitate research in these directions, we propose CARLANE, a 3-way sim-to-real domain adaptation benchmark for 2D lane detection.
- Europe > France > Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.49)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.94)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots > Autonomous Vehicles (0.49)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.46)